呜呜伯行为考 Observation on Wubbaboo Behavior

关于界种科藏品、灵质生物「呜呜伯」的行为习性研究报告。 Behavioral research report about the Department of Ecology's collection, the spiritual organism Wubbaboo.

*该纸页布满褶皱，显然曾被用力揉作一团再丢弃。*

*This page is extremely wrinkled. It is obvious that someone had crumbled it into a ball before tossing it away.*

文档编号：510523455323647432

File Number: 510523455323647432

隶属科目：星域界种科

Department: Department of Ecology

著作权归属：荣仓终

Copyright Ownership: Eikura Shuu

课题累计提交次数：第7次

Number of Times Submitted: 7

拟定入库日期：琥珀历2157纪第32月11日

Estimated Filing Date: 32, 11, 2157 AE

正文

Main body

呜呜伯以单体、群行、寄生的方式存在于世间。已知在非寄生状态下，呜呜伯行踪诡秘；寄生于宿主后，呜呜伯的破坏性与宿主的行动力呈正相关①②。

Wubbaboos exist in the world individually, in groups, and parasitically. It is known that when without a host, Wubbaboos keep their whereabouts hidden. After they parasitized a host, their destructiveness is positively correlated with the host's mobility①②.

根据小范围样本库测试③，呜呜伯的单体智力可媲美六岁人类幼童。群行时，它们的单体智力将大幅下降。这是因为灵质生物的思维波存在干扰效应，频率共振将会影响各自的决策。

Based on a small test sample③, a singular Wubbaboo possesses the intelligence of a roughly six-year-old human. When in a group, the Wubbaboos' individual intelligence reduces dramatically. This is because the thought waves of spiritual organisms interfere with each other, and a resonance in frequency will affect their individual decision-making.

不论是否寄生于宿主，呜呜伯（及其宿主）的行动都遵循以下四种逻辑：

Whether with or without a host, the actions of the Wubbaboo (and its host) will abide by the four following rules:

1.快乐的呜呜伯将快速流窜于包含五个角以上的房间。

1. Happy Wubbaboos will quickly run around a room with five or more corners.

2.悲伤的呜呜伯将聚集于冷僻无人的房间，共享彼此的哀思。

2. Sad Wubbaboos will gather in an empty room and share their unhappy thoughts with one another.

3.愤怒的呜呜伯将暴露于光线充足之处，部分呜呜伯将无法承受强烈的情绪，化为银河齑粉。

3. Angry Wubbaboos will expose themselves to strong rays of light. Some Wubbaboos will not be able to bear strong emotions and scatter into cosmic dust.

4.平静的呜呜伯将进入一生中行踪最为诡秘的时刻。它们大肆破坏所过之处，戏弄周遭生物，既无目的，也无意义，只是为了纯粹的恶作剧，不枉民间将其谑称为「戏命鬼」或「捣蛋星灵」。

4. Calm Wubbaboos will experience the strangest period of their life. They will destroy everything in their path and prank organisms around them out of no reason but pure mischief, truly living up to their nicknames of being a Jinx or Mischievous Astral Spirit.

注释

Comment

①参考文献：《巫伯附身空间站莽汉，一月内偷盗113双辐射防护鞋，气味过大终于落网》，出自《黑塔轶闻》琥珀历2156纪第25月刊。

①Cited Reference: "Wubbaboo possesses space station brute, steals 113 pairs of radiation protective boots in under a month. Caught due to unbearable odor" from Herta Urban Legends issue 2156 AE Month 25.

②参考文献：《闪电战！建站以来最快收容行动：五分钟内抓捕归案，巫伯附身七旬老太》，出自《黑塔轶闻》琥珀历2157纪第07月刊。

②Cited Reference: "Blitz! Quickest collection operation in station history: Wubbaboo possesses seventy-year-old woman, caught and booked within five minutes" from Herta Urban Legends issue 2157 AE Month 7.

③一测抽样对象为科员阿德勒，由于阿德勒表现出超越年龄的智力表现，结果无效。二测抽样对象为科员温世玲，本文采纳此次测验结论。

③The first sample is taken from researcher Adler. Due to Adler's spectacular display of intelligence in his age group, the results were ineffective. The second sample is taken from researcher Wen Shiling. This paper has adopted the test conclusions of this sample.

审阅人反馈

Reviewer Feedback

1.参考文献别从轶闻里找，这是常识。

1. It's common sense not to reference urban legends.

2.抽样范围是否足够大？足够多样？仅凭单次对照粗暴得出结论是否符合黑塔研究价值观？

2. Is the sample size large enough? Have enough samples been taken? Does abruptly coming to a conclusion based on a singular sample reference fit with the Herta Space Station's research values?

*不是我不想找，但在空间站找不到第三个儿童，能怪我？*

*So it's my fault that there are only two children on the space station?*

3.什么叫「包含五个角以上的房间」？

3. What does "rooms with five or more corners" mean?

*五个角的房间就是不止有四个角的房间，还能怎么解释。*

*A room with more than five corners means a room with more than just four corners. How else do you want me to explain it?*

4.「部分呜呜伯将无法承受强烈的情绪，化为银河齑粉」，该研究结论如何得出？建议彻查该科员是否遵循研究守则，有无损害藏品资产等不端行为。

4. "Some Wubbaboos will not be able to bear strong emotions and scatter into cosmic dust." What were the steps that led to this research conclusion? I recommend an investigation looking into whether this researcher has abided by the research guidelines, and if there were unacceptable behaviors such as damaging collections and assets.

审阅结论

Review Conclusion

研究过程缺乏严谨性与科学性，研究结论是否正确，有待证明。

The research process is grossly lacking in scientific rigor and approach. The validity of the research conclusion is yet to be proven.

科室评估结论：未通过，不予入库归档

Department Evaluation Conclusion: Failed. Will not be filed and stored

一审评估人：卡波特•杜奥•兰奇*去你的罢！*

First Evaluation Reviewer: Capote Dow Lanci*To hell with you!*

二审评估人：无

Second Evaluation Reviewer: None